dos. The fresh Relationship Questionnaire (RQ). The fresh new RQ was developed of the Bartholomew and you may published by Bartholomew and you can Horowitz (1991). So it thinking-statement means is made to evaluate mature attachment in this Bartholomew’s (1990) four-group framework. Styles A good and you will B match the fresh new secure and you will afraid-avoidant attachment models, correspondingly. Appearance C and you can D correspond to the fresh new possessed and dismissing-avoidant attachment habits respectively. Since the found of the Brennan, Razor, and you can Tobey (1991), Looks A good, B, and C correspond correspondingly so you’re able to Hazan and you can Shaver’s (1987, 1990) Safer, Avoidant, and you will Anxious/Ambivalent appearances. Bartholomew’s level adds the new dismissing-avoidant category and you will cities the fresh new four groups toward a-two-dimensional design. Brand new RQ is not popular in the contemporary lookup because the many dimension services because early 1990’s enjoys focused on playing with multi-items stocks to evaluate earliest attachment constructs.
step three. The fresh ECR is good thirty six-item thinking-statement attachment easure developed by Brennan mais aussi al. (1998). What exactly was indeed produced by a very important factor data of all of the away from the present thinking-statement actions out of adult personal accessory. The newest scale are often used to manage several subscales, Prevention (otherwise Serious pain which have Intimacy and Serious pain Based on Others) and you will Stress (or Fear of Getting rejected and you can Abandonment). See the Brennan ainsi que al. part more resources for scoring. Brennan mais aussi al. derived five form of otherwise style groups from the a couple size, and the groups forecast particular build legitimacy real West Palm Beach hookup sites variables better than this new RQ. However the models of categories have been quite different from the models that obtains into the RQ. (Differences between the class products acquired with assorted connection methods was to-be expected, due to the fact new categories do not seem to be «real» but given that places in a-two-dimensional area; discover Fraley & Waller (1998).
4. Experiences in the Close Dating Revised (ECR-R). New ECR-Roentgen is actually a thirty-six-goods self-report connection scale created by Fraley, Waller, and you may Brennan (2000). Things was produced from something response concept (IRT) data of most of present mind-declaration actions out-of mature intimate accessory (look for Brennan mais aussi al., 1998). Such as the ECR, the latest ECR-R productivity score with the a couple subscales, Avoidance (otherwise Pain that have Intimacy and Problems having Based Others) and you may Nervousness (or Concern about Getting rejected and you will Abandonment). See Fraley, Waller, and you will Brennan to learn more about rating. A home-rating style of the fresh new ECR-R exists towards-range at the .
5. Feel inside Close Matchmaking-Relationship Formations (ECR-RS). The newest ECR-RS try good contextual mind-statement way of measuring attachment. It’s very designed to getting a somewhat quick level to own investigators who want to target certain matchmaking and certainly will be used because the a state-eg measure when needed. You can study more and more the latest ECR-RS right here.
Feel inside Romantic Relationships (ECR)
6. County Adult Attachment Measure (SAAM). The SAAM was created because of the Gillath, Hart, Noftle, and you will Stockdale (2009) in fact it is built to assess county-including type inside the functioning types of accessory. A duplicate of scale exists thru Omri Gillath’s website.
A beneficial. Simpson and you will W. S. Rholes and you will had written Guilford Press. The fresh new chapters, inside our opinion, are very important understanding for anyone curious about a lot more about brand new reputation for notice-report steps from connection, this new controversies encompassing the aid of types against. proportions, plus the communication or non-telecommunications anywhere between self-declaration and you may interview methods. The chapters come here simply for readers’ advice. Since chapters try proprietary by the Guilford Push, they need to not recreated instead consent.
These about three chapters are from this new 1998 regularity, Accessory Idea and you may Intimate Relationship , edited from the J
step 1. Brennan, Clark, Shaver (1998). As previously mentioned briefly significantly more than, new Brennan ainsi que al. hapter contains perhaps one of the most has just set-up multiple-item measure of notice-claimed close accessory looks. This new section also includes the historical past of self-statement scales and you may a comprehensive summary of more balances.